期刊导航

论文摘要

3 种预成桩与4 种核成型材料的结合力比较

Comparative study on the binding force among three different prefabricated posts

作者:刘萍, 朱智敏, 廖运茂, 谭智

Author:LIU Ping , ZHU Zhi-min , LIAO Yun-mao , TAN Zhi

收稿日期:2009-01-09          年卷(期)页码:2009,36(5):509-511

期刊名称:国际口腔医学杂志

Journal Name:International Journal of Stomatology

关键字:预成桩,树脂核,桩核结合力,

Key words:prefabricated post, resin core, binding force between post and core,

基金项目:

中文摘要

目的 比较3 种不同材质的预成桩钉与4 种核成型材料的结合力。方法 预成不锈钢桩、玻璃纤维树脂桩和渗透陶瓷桩分别与ParaCore、Clearfill、Durafill 和F2000 复合体核材料结合,测试不同桩-核材料间的结合力并对其进行比较。结果 3 种预成桩中,具有机械固位设计的不锈钢桩组与树脂核的结合力最高;4 种成核材料与桩的结合力分别是ParaCore 组和Clearfill 组高于Durafill 组和F2000 复合体组,F2000 复合体与桩的结合力最低。结论 临床选用桩时可考虑利用机械锁结固位,并通过表面粗糙化处理来增加桩-核的结合;采用结合力强、流动性好的树脂材料成核,可获得更好的桩-核结合效果。

英文摘要

Objective To compare the binding force among three different prefabricated posts and four different resin core materials. Methods Three types of posts with four types of cores(Parapost with ParaCore, Clearfill, Durafill and F2000, Tenax Fiber White post with ParaCore, Clearfill, Durafill and F2000, CW ceramic post with Clearfill) were made. The adhesive shearing strength between different posts and cores were measured by a universal testing machine. Results The binding force between parapost and cores was the highest in three posts. The binding force between posts and Paracore or Clearfill cores were higher than that between post and Durafill or F2000 cores. In all these four cores, the binding force between posts and F2000 was the lowest. Conclusion To achieve good clinical performance, mechanical lock is very important to retention of post and cores. In addition, core materials have high intension and good liquidity.

下一条:基于图像存档与传输系统的牙片数字化研究

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065