期刊导航

论文摘要

自锁托槽与传统托槽的临床比较

Clinical comparison of self-ligating bracket and traditional bracket

作者:王娅婷综述 王军审校

Author:WANG Ya-ting, WANG Jun.

收稿日期:          年卷(期)页码:2010,37(4):492-495

期刊名称:国际口腔医学杂志

Journal Name:International Journal of Stomatology

关键字:自锁托槽, 特点, 临床比较,

Key words:self-ligating bracket, feature, clinic comparison,

基金项目:

中文摘要

自1935 年自锁托槽问世以来,已经在现代正畸治疗中得到了日益广泛的应用。目前,自锁托槽主要分 为主动自锁托槽和被动自锁托槽。与传统的托槽相比较,自锁托槽的优点是托槽与弓丝之间摩擦力小,矫治力 量柔和且持久,有利于牙周组织的改建,加快了牙齿移动的速度,从而缩短了疗程;操作简单,有效减少了患 者每次复诊的椅旁操作时间。自锁托槽的缺点主要表现为对牙齿的控制较差,容易发生牙齿的倾斜移动和前牙 转矩表达不足。本文对自锁托槽与传统托槽在正畸各个治疗阶段分别进行比较,总结自锁托槽的优点和不足。

英文摘要

Since its emergence in 1935, self-ligating brackets have been widely used in contemporary orthodontic treatment, which can be divided into active and passive self-ligating brackets. Comparing to the conventional brackets, the self-ligating brackets have the advantages of lighter force, lower friction with archwires, more convenient for clinical operation and shorter treatment time. However, the disadvantages of self-ligating brackets are poor control of teeth, such as tilting movement of teeth, and inadequate expression of torque of anterior teeth, etc. In this article, the merits and faults as well as clinical effects of self-ligating brackets in every stage of orthodontic treatment are assessed.

上一条:Herbst 矫治器对下颌后缩患者颞下颌关节改建的研究进展

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065