期刊导航

论文摘要

不同树脂粘接剂对渗透陶瓷粘接强度的影响

Shear bond strengths of different types of adhesive resin agents to glass infiltrated alumina oxide ceramic

作者:钟群 沈晴昳 邬雪颖 李国强

Author:Zhong Qun, Shen Qingyi, Wu Xueying, Li Guoqiang.

收稿日期:2010-08-16          年卷(期)页码:2012,39(1):16-19

期刊名称:国际口腔医学杂志

Journal Name:International Journal of Stomatology

关键字:剪切强度, 树脂粘接剂, 玻璃渗透氧化铝陶瓷,

Key words:shear bond strength, adhesive resin agent, glass infiltrated alumina oxide ceramic,

基金项目:

中文摘要

目的 观察比较不同树脂粘接剂对氧化铝渗透陶瓷粘接剪切强度的效果。方法 选择无龋坏的人离体磨牙40 颗,处理后随机分为4 组,每组10 件。A 组用Solobond Plus 粘接剂+Bifix QM 粘接剂,B 组用FuturabondDC 粘接剂+Bifix QM 粘接剂,C 组用Bifix SE 自酸蚀树脂粘接剂,D 组用Panavia F 双重聚合型粘接材料。所有样本在37 ℃蒸馏水中储存24 h 后进行测试,记录剪切强度值,用SAS 6.12 统计软件对结果进行单因素方差分析。结果 Panavia F 双重聚合型粘接材料组的剪切强度显著高于其他3组(P

英文摘要

Objective To observe and compare the shear bond strength of different composite resin cement systems to glass infiltrated alumina oxide ceramic. Methods 40 healthy non-carious human molars were selected in the study. The samples were divided into four groups, 10 pieces for each group, including group A(Solobond Plus+Bifix QM), group B(Futurabond DC+Bifix QM), group C(Bifix SE), and group D(Panavia F). All specimens were stored in water at 37 °C for 24 hours. The shear bond strength of four different bonding systems to dentin was tested respectively. The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA with SAS 6.12. Results Shear bond strength of Panavia F was significantly higher than that of other three groups(P

下一条:自攻型微螺钉支抗在上颌前突正畸矫治中的应用

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065