期刊导航

论文摘要

自锁托槽与传统托槽矫治拔牙病例的疗程对比研究

Comparison of different treatment durations between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in the extraction cases

作者:刘娟1 李美乐2 方善宝2 杜熹2

Author:Liu Juan1, Li Meile2, Fang Shanbao2, Du Xi2.

收稿日期:          年卷(期)页码:2015,42(1):22-23

期刊名称:国际口腔医学杂志

Journal Name:International Journal of Stomatology

关键字:自锁托槽,传统直丝托槽,疗程,

Key words:self-ligating bracket,conventional straight bracket,duration,

基金项目:

中文摘要

目的 比较自锁托槽与传统直丝托槽矫治拔牙病例的疗程。方法 纳入需拔牙矫治的正畸病例60例随机分为2组,30例为试验组,采用Damon Q自锁托槽进行矫治,30例为对照组,采用传统直丝托槽矫治,记录并比较治疗完成的时间。结果 试验组平均完成时间为640 d,对照组平均完成时间为686 d,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 自锁托槽在治疗拔牙病例时与传统直丝托槽相比,疗程未见明显的时间优势。

英文摘要

Objective To compare the different treatment durations between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in extraction cases. Methods Sixty extraction cases were collected and randomly divided into two groups(n=30), namely, experimental and control. The experimental group was treated with Damon Q self-ligating brackets. The control group was treated with conventional straight brackets. The durations of the treatments were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results The experimental group finished the treatment at an average of 640 d, where as the control group finished at an average of 686 d. However, no significant difference in treatment duration was found between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The self-ligating brackets did not reduce the duration of the treatment compared with the conventional brackets.

下一条:肿痛安治疗癌症放射治疗后颞下颌关节疼痛的疗效评价

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065