期刊导航

论文摘要

HPLC-MS/MS法测定血浆中华法林对映异构体浓度

Determination of Warfarin Enantiomers in Human Plasma with HPLC-MS/MS

作者:沈艳聪, 向瑾, 梁茂植等

Author:SHEN Yan-cong, XIang Jin, LIang Mao-zhi. et al

收稿日期:          年卷(期)页码:2016,47(1):106-110

期刊名称:四川大学学报(医学版)

Journal Name:JOURNAL OF SICHUAN UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE EDITION)

关键字:高效液相色谱串联质谱法 华法林对映异构体 血药浓度

Key words:HPLC-MS/MS Warfarin enantiomers Plasma concentration

基金项目:

中文摘要

目的 建立高效液相色谱串联质谱法(HPLC-MS/MS)测定人血浆中华法林对映异构体的浓度。方法 以乙酸乙酯为萃取剂,采用MS Chiral? MS-OD(50×2.1 mm, 3 μm)为手性柱,流动相为甲醇∶水∶甲酸=85∶15∶0.05,流速为0.18 mL/min。采用负离子模式,电喷雾离子源(ESI),以萘普生为内标定量,华法林和内标的检测离子对质荷比分别为(m/z)307.2→160.9和(m/z)228.9→185.1。结果 R-华法林批内精密度,其相对标准偏差(RSD)为3.2%~5.8%,批间RSD为2.5%~5.1%;方法回收率(96.1±5.6)%~(105.4±4.7)%,提取回收率80.7%~84.4%,内标基质效应校准后的基质效应RSDRSD为3.7%~5.2%,批间RSD为3.2%~4.8%;方法回收率(98.3±5.1)%~(103.7±3.8)%,提取回收率81.3%~84.6%,内标基质效应校准后的基质效应RSD

英文摘要

Objective To establish a high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method for determination of warfarin enantiomers in human plasma. Methods Warfarin enantiomers were extracted with ethyl acetate. The HPLC-MS/MS method used naproxen as internal standard, with methanol∶water∶formic acid=85∶15∶0.05 as mobile phase, at a flow rate of 0.18 mL/min. R-warfain, S-warfarin and internal standard (IS) were separated on column MS Chiral?MS-OD (50×2.1 mm, 3 μm). Warfarin enantiomers were protonated with electroapry ionization (ESI) in negative electron ionization mode. The ion pairs being detected were (m/z) 307.2→160.9 (R-warfain and S-warafrin) and (m/z) 228.9→185.1 (IS). Results The within-run precision relative standard deviations (RSD) and between-run precision RSDof R-warfarin were 3.2%-5.8% and 2.5%-5.1%, respectively. The method recoveries and extraction recoveries of R-warfarin were (96.1±5.6)%-(105.4±4.7)% and 80.7%-84.4%, respectively. The matrix effect RSD was less than 10%. The within-run precision RSD and between-run precision RSDof S-warfarin were 3.7%-5.2% and 3.2%-4.8%, respectively. The method recoveries and extraction recoveries of S-warfarin were (98.3±5.1)%-(103.7±3.8)% and 81.3%-84.6%, respectively. The limit of quantification was 0.1 μg/mL for both analytes. Conclusion This new method is fully validated with satisfactory accuracy and adequate reproducibility. Therefore, it can be applied for separating and detecting plasma warfarin enantiomers.

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065