期刊导航

论文摘要

全拔甲后甲板回植术及部分拔甲术与传统全拔甲术的 对比评价

作者:薛斯亮, 梅蓉, 武丹等

Author:XUE Si-liang, MEI Rong, WU Dan. et al

收稿日期:          年卷(期)页码:2017,48(1):151-153

期刊名称:四川大学学报(医学版)

Journal Name:JOURNAL OF SICHUAN UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE EDITION)

关键字:拔甲术 部分拔甲 甲回植

Key words:Nail avulsion Partial nail avulsion Plate replacement

基金项目:

中文摘要

目的 比较保留甲板的全拔甲后甲板回植术和部分拔甲术与传统全拔甲术的区别。方法 患者由随机数字表分配到传统全拔甲组(对照组)、部分拔甲组、全拔甲后甲板回植术组(全拔甲回植组),每组20例,分别行不同拔甲手术。比较3种术后患者疼痛、甲床完全愈合时间、甲板完全生长时间、甲完全生长后结果评分。结果3组患者基线差异无统计学意义。术后8 h,对照组患者疼痛评分高于其他两组( P P P

英文摘要

Objective To determine the different effects of partial nail avulsion and total nail avulsion with plate replacement with traditional total nail avulsion. Methods Patients were divided into three groups randomly ( n=20): total nail avulsion group (control group), partial nail avulsion group,and total nail avulsion with plate replacement group (nail replacement group). The rating of pain 〔visual analogue scale (VAS) score〕, the wound healing time, the nail growth time ,and the score of satisfaction were analyzed. Results The baseline data of three groups had no significant difference. From 8 h, VAS score of partial nail avulsion group and nail plate replacement group was different with that in control group ( P P P P P

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065