期刊导航

论文摘要

4种麻醉方法在牙髓病治疗中止痛效果的比较

Comparison of the Painless Effect of Four Anesthetic Methods during Pulpal Treatment

作者:陈秀梅;郭斌;周学东;阙克华

Author:CHEN Xiu-mei1, GUO Bin1, ZHOU Xue-dong2, QUE Ke-hua1

收稿日期:2006-06-25          年卷(期)页码:2006,24(03):237-

期刊名称:华西口腔医学杂志

Journal Name:West China Journal of Stomatology

关键字:麻醉方法,牙髓炎,止痛,

Key words:anesthetic methods,pulpitis,acesodyne,

基金项目:

中文摘要

目的 比较4种不同麻醉方法在牙髓病治疗中的止痛效果。方法 选择80例牙髓炎患者为研究对象,将其随机分为4组,每组20例患者20颗患牙,治疗时分别采用必兰行下颌神经阻滞麻醉、黏膜下浸润麻醉和牙周膜内浸润麻醉、牙髓腔内浸润麻醉4种方法,对麻醉起效时间、麻醉效果和持续时间等进行比较。结果 与牙周膜内浸润麻醉和牙髓腔内浸润麻醉相比,下颌神经阻滞麻醉和黏膜下浸润麻醉的麻药用量较大,麻醉起效时间较晚,持续时间较长(P<0.05);麻醉效果中,下颌神经阻滞麻醉效果最好,但4种麻醉方法的综合麻醉效果评分结果无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 4种麻醉方法各有优势,在临床上应综合考虑以选择适宜的麻醉方法。

英文摘要

Objective To compare the painless effect of four anesthetic methods during opening pulp cavity and undergoing pulpectomy for acute or chronic pulpitis. Methods 80 teeth of 80 patients were randomly allocated into four groups. Each group had 20 teeth. Anesthetic methods applied four different groups included block anesthesia of nerve, supraperiosteal infiltration, periodontal membrane injection and intrapulpal injection. Anesthesia doses were recorded and the pierced points, the zones of pain, the time of anesthesia action, the time of anesthesia persistence and the degrees of anesthesia were evaluated with four levels synthetic evaluation standard of anesthesia. Results Compared with periodontal membrane injection and intrapulpal injection, block anesthesia of nerve and supraperiosteal infiltration had the later time of anesthesia action and the longer time of anesthesia persistence(P<0.05). In four anesthetic methods, block anesthesia of nerve had the best painless effect(P<0.05). Conclusion Four anesthetic methods have their own superiorities, and we should select proper anesthetic methods in clinical work.

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065