期刊导航

论文摘要

能谱CT定量参数值在腮腺肿瘤定性诊断中的应用价值

Clinical value of quantitative parameters by spectral CT in parotid gland tumor

作者:苏蕾,谢晨露,孙强,高剑波

Author:Su Lei,Xie Chenlu,Sun Qiang,Gao Jianbo

收稿日期:2019-03-17          年卷(期)页码:2019,37(6):631-631-635

期刊名称:华西口腔医学杂志

Journal Name:West China Journal of Stomatology

关键字:腮腺肿瘤,体层摄影术,能谱成像,碘基值,

Key words:parotid gland tumor,tomography,spectral imaging,iodine concentration,

基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81402231);河南省科技厅科技攻关项目(172102310262)

中文摘要

目的 通过对腮腺肿瘤的能谱曲线斜率(SACS)、曲线下面积(AUC)、标准化碘基值(NIC)、碘浓度差(ICD)的比较,分析能谱定量参数值在腮腺肿瘤定性诊断中的应用价值。方法 应用能谱CT对92例腮腺肿瘤患者进行动脉期(AP)、静脉期(VP)增强扫描。依据病理结果分为多形性腺瘤组(A组)、沃辛瘤组(B组)、基底细胞腺瘤组(C组)、恶性肿瘤组(D组)。测量并计算双期扫描中肿瘤的SACS、AUC、NIC及ICD。多组定量资料比较采用单因素方差分析,P结果 A组SACSAP、AUCAP及NICAP均低于其余各组,C组SACSVP、AUCVP均高于其余各组,D组NICAP、NICVP高于其他各组,B组ICD差值为正值。除B组和C组间SACSAP、AUCAP的差异以及C组和D组间SACSVP、AUCVP的差异以及A组和C组间ICD的差异无统计学意义外,其余各组之间的差异均具有统计学意义(PAP的差异以及A组和C组、A组和D组、B组和C组NICVP的差异具有统计学意义(P=0.005、0.025、0.002、0.038、0.049)。结论 不同病理类型的腮腺肿瘤能谱CT定量参数值存在差异,利用能谱CT多参数成像有助于腮腺肿瘤的定性诊断。

英文摘要

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the value of normalized iodine concentration (NIC), spectral attenuation curve slope (SACS), area under curve (AUC), and iodine concentration difference (ICD) generated from spectral CT in the assessment of parotid gland tumors.MethodsNinety-two patients with pathologically confirmed parotid gland tumors underwent arterial phase- and venous phase-enhanced CT in spectral CT. The patients were divided into the pleomorphic adenoma group (group A), Warthin tumor group (group B), basal cell tumor group (group C), and malignant tumor group (group D). The SACS, AUC, NIC, ICD were measured and analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA, and statistical significance was set atPResultsSACSAP, AUCAP, and NICAPin group A were lower than those in other groups; SACSVPand AUCVPin group C were higher than those in other groups; NICAPand NICVPin group D were higher than those in other groups; and ICD in group B was a positive number. The difference in SACSAPand AUCAPin groups B and C, SACSVPand AUCVPin groups C and D, and ICD in groups A and C were not statistically significant. By contrast, the difference between the other groups was statistically significant (PAPbetween groups A and B and groups C and D and the difference in NICVPbetween groups A and C, groups A and D, and groups B and C were statistically significant (P=0.005, 0.025, 0.002, 0.038, and 0.049, respectively).ConclusionMulti-quantitative parameters from spectral CT might be helpful in differentiating various types of parotid gland tumors.

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065