暴雨山洪灾害预警指标计算方法比较研究
Comparative Study on Methods of Early Warning Index of Flash Flood Disaster Induced by Rainstorm
作者:杨坡(四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610065);许泽星(四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610065);闫旭峰(四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610065);王协康(四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610065)
Author:YANG Po(State Key Lab. of Hydraulics and Mountain River Eng., Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China);XU Zexing(State Key Lab. of Hydraulics and Mountain River Eng., Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China);YAN Xufeng(State Key Lab. of Hydraulics and Mountain River Eng., Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China);WANG Xiekang(State Key Lab. of Hydraulics and Mountain River Eng., Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China)
收稿日期:2020-01-16 年卷(期)页码:2020,52(4):157-165
期刊名称:工程科学与技术
Journal Name:Advanced Engineering Sciences
关键字:山洪灾害;成灾水位;洪水陡涨率;实时累积雨量;山洪预警
Key words:flash flood disaster;water level occurred disaster;rising rate of flood level;the real-time accumulated precipitation;flash flood early warning
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1502504);国家自然科学基金重点项目(51639007);四川省科技计划资助项目(2019YJ0145)
中文摘要
山区河流受地形地貌及降雨过程影响,洪水具有显著的陡涨、陡落过程,这种短历时陡涨过程极大缩短了沿河居民的有效安全转移时间,给山洪灾害防治带来了极大困难。山洪预警预报是山洪灾害防治非工程措施的重要组成部分,一般分为水位预警和雨量预警。由于山区洪水历时短且监测站不足,水位预警在国内应用较少,传统流量反推法常以雨洪同频计算预警雨量,预警结果多出现漏警,不能满足防御山洪灾害的实际需求。为提高暴雨山洪的预警精度及预警时长,提出了基于洪水上涨率判定法和实时累积雨量法两种计算预警指标的方法。以四川省金沙江支流中都河流域“8·16”山洪灾害为例,依据不同预警方法的预警准确性与预警时长,探讨了这两种方法与传统水位流量反推法的差异。结果表明:传统水位流量反推法的预警精度较低,难以达到预期的预警效果;洪水上涨率判定法的预警精度较高,但该方法的预警时长受洪水涨退特性影响,对延长预警时长有一定影响;采用基于小流域场次洪水与降雨过程变化关系的实时累积雨量法其结果均未出现漏警,且有效延长了预警时长,若以山洪灾害技术要求的预警时长30 min为准,提出的两种方法延长预警时长基本超过30%,满足预警要求。因此,建议在设定累积雨量阈值的基础上,结合洪水上涨率进行灾害预警,以便更为有效地提高山洪灾害的预警准确率。
英文摘要
Affected by steep geomorphology and intensive rainfall, mountain rivers are characterized by steep rise and fall hydrograph, greatly shortening the response time of residents along the river and posing great challenges to the high-precision early warning and forecasting of flash floods. Flash flood early warning is an important part of non-structural measures for disaster prevention and damage reduction and is commonly divided into water level early warning and precipitation early warning. Since the flood period is extremely short in small-sized basins where automatic monitoring stations cannot cover all the areas, the water level early warning is unpopularly used in China. The early warning based on rainfall threshold calculated by the water level/flow inversion method often misses the event due to the same frequency assumption of the rainstorm and flood, which cannot meet the actual need of mountainous flash flood prevention. To improve the early warning accuracy and increase the warning advance time of flash floods, two new methods of calculating the early warning indicators are proposed, based on methods of the rising rate in flood level and real-time accumulated precipitation. Taking the "8·16" flash flood disasters in Zhongdu River Basin (a tributary of Jinsha River in Sichuan Province) as an example, the early warning indicators are calculated by the above-mentioned methods, and the calculated results are compared to each other regarding the early warning accuracy and advance time. The results show that the early warning accuracy of inversion on water level/flow is limited in achieving the expected early-warning effect. The early warning accuracy based on the method of flood rising rate is higher. However, the early warning period from the stage rise to the peak is found to be affected by the flash flood characteristics and is relatively short. The method based on the real-time accumulated precipitation issues every alarm and prolongs the warning advance time of flash flood effectively. In addition, if the minimum 30 minutes flood warning advance time is required, the two new methods can extend the warning time by at least 30%. In conclusion, setting the threshold of accumulated rainfall combined with the rising rate of flood for disaster early warning is suggested to improve the early warning accuracy of flash flood disaster.
上一条:深基坑与邻近建筑物相互影响的实测及数值分析
【关闭】