期刊导航

论文摘要

天平刚度对测力系统输出结果影响的研究

Research of the Balance Stiffness on the Output Impact of a Force-measurement System

作者:吕金洲(西南交通大学 机械工程学院 摩擦学研究所,四川 成都 610031);陈光雄(西南交通大学 机械工程学院 摩擦学研究所,四川 成都 610031);朱琪(西南交通大学 机械工程学院 摩擦学研究所,四川 成都 610031);赵晓男(西南交通大学 机械工程学院 摩擦学研究所,四川 成都 610031);吴波文(西南交通大学 机械工程学院 摩擦学研究所,四川 成都 610031)

Author:LYU Jinzhou(Tribology Research Inst., School of Mechanical Eng., Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China);CHEN Guangxiong(Tribology Research Inst., School of Mechanical Eng., Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China);ZHU Qi(Tribology Research Inst., School of Mechanical Eng., Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China);ZHAO Xiaonan(Tribology Research Inst., School of Mechanical Eng., Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China);WU Bowen(Tribology Research Inst., School of Mechanical Eng., Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China)

收稿日期:2018-11-25          年卷(期)页码:2020,52(2):161-170

期刊名称:工程科学与技术

Journal Name:Advanced Engineering Sciences

关键字:测力天平;测力系统;刚度;惯性补偿;测量精度

Key words:force-measurement balance;force-measurement system;stiffness;inertia compensation;measurement accuracy

基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51775461)

中文摘要

测力系统(FMS)在脉冲燃烧风洞中试验时,天平刚度会对其输出结果产生重要影响。为研究该问题,首先对测力系统进行了简化,并给出了相应的动力学方程;其次,对不同刚度的测力系统(FMS-A、FMS-B和FMS-C)进行了虚拟标定和模态分析,获得了两者的刚度矩阵和模态参数;最后,对FMS-A、FMS-B和FMS-C进行了瞬态仿真分析,获得了相应的动态输出。计算结果表明:惯性补偿前,测力系统均值测量精度普遍高于93.00%,惯性补偿后均值测量精度超过99.60%,但相同加载时测力系统均值输出结果相差很小,证明天平刚度对测力系统均值测量精度的影响较小。同时,瞬时输出结果与输入载荷基本一致,FMS-A轴向力、法向力和俯仰力矩的瞬时测量精度分别高于85.13%、80.14%和68.40%,FMS-B各分量的瞬时测量精度分别高于85.90%、83.48%和69.90%,FMS-C各分量的瞬时测量精度分别高于85.91%、89.05%和74.67%,表明在一定范围内,测力系统瞬时测量精度随着天平刚度的增大而提高。

英文摘要

The measurement result of the force-measurement system (FMS) will be greatly impacted by the stiffness of the force balance when it is used in an impulse combustion wind tunnel. To study this issue, firstly, the FMS is simplified and its dynamic motion equation is given. Secondly, the stiffness matrixes and modal parameters of the FMS-A, FMS-B, and FMS-C with different stiffness are acquired by the virtual calibration and modal analysis. Thirdly, the transient simulations of FMS-A, FMS-B, and FMS-C are conducted to acquire their responses. The results show that the mean measurement accuracies before and after the inertia compensation are higher than 93.00% and 99.60%, respectively. The mean outputs of FMS-A, FMS-B, and FMS-C are close to each other when the same loads are applied on the test model. This proves that the stiffness of the force balance has little influence on the mean measurement accuracies of the FMS. In addition, the transient output histories are approximately consistent with the inputs. The transient measurement accuracies of FMS-A in drag, lift, and pitching moment are higher than 85.13%, 80.14%, and 68.40%, respectively. They are higher than 85.90%, 83.48%, and 69.90% as to FMS-B, respectively and they are higher than 85.91%, 89.05%, and 74.67% as to FMS-C, respectively. This shows that, on a certain range, the transient measurement accuracies are improved with the increase of the stiffness of the force balance.

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065