期刊导航

论文摘要

基于SWAT分布式水文模型的河道内生态基流

River Ecological Base Flow Based on Distributed Hydrological Model of SWAT

作者:肖玉成(重庆市巴渝水利规划院);董飞(中国水利水电科学研究院 水环境研究所);张新华(四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室);霍风霖(北京市人民政府 防汛抗旱指挥部办公室);彭文启(中国水利水电科学研究院 水环境研究所)

Author:Xiao Yucheng(Chongqing Bayu Water Resources Planning Inst.);Dong Fei(Dept.of Water and Environment,China Inst.of Water Resources and Hydropower Research);Zhang Xinhua(State Key Lab. of Hydraulics and Mountain River Eng.,Sichuan Univ.);Huo Fenglin(Office of Beijing City Flood Control and Drought Relief Headquarter);Peng Wenqi(Dept.of Water and Environment,China Inst.of Water Resources and Hydropower Research)

收稿日期:2012-09-18          年卷(期)页码:2013,45(1):85-90

期刊名称:工程科学与技术

Journal Name:Advanced Engineering Sciences

关键字:生态基流;生态需水;SWAT分布式水文模型;情景设计;袁河流域

Key words:ecological base flow;ecological water demands;distributed hydrological model of SWAT;scenario design;Yuan River basin

基金项目:国家科技重大专项基金资助项目(2008ZX07526-004-T007;2009ZX07104-001;2009ZX07212-002-003)

中文摘要

河道内生态基流是保证河流健康和基本功能不退化的最小流量,但是,现有的一些研究方法很少从流域内水循环的角度考虑。为此,以赣江袁河流域为例,运用SWAT分布式水文模型,根据逐日降雨量等资料进行了情景设计,模拟得到了10%~50%多年平均降雨量下的河流径流、基流等数据,根据生态基流的概念和内涵,重点分析了袁河中上游特定生态功能保护区的生态基流。计算得到芦溪和茅洲2个保护断面的生态基流分别为1.25和17.0 m^3/s,占多年平均流量的11.1%和17.4%,并将该结果与其它方法计算得到的生态基流进行了对比分析,结果表明,通过情景设计,使用SWAT模型模拟数据计算得到的河道内生态基流与其它方法计算得到的结果基本一致,说明了使用SWAT模型研究生态基流的可行性。

英文摘要

Ecological base flow (EBF) is a minimum channel flow to maintain a healthy river system and to avoid deteriorating its functions. A case study was conducted in the Yuanhe River which belongs to the Ganjiang River,a branch river of the Yangtze River.In this study,a distributed hydrological model of SWAT was adopted to simulate runoffs and base flows based on daily precipitations and designed scenarios of rainfalls. According to the concept of EBF and the content of base flows,the EBF at the important ecological function zones of the middle to the upper stream of the Yuanhe River was analyzed. Results showed that the EBF at the Luxi and Maozhou hydrological stations is 1.25 m3/s and 17.0 m^3/s,respectively,accounting for 11.14% and 17.39% of their averaged annual flows, respectively.These results are close to the results calculated by other methods.In addition,EBFs based on a distributed hydrological model of SWAT have the mechanism of water cycle and should be more reasonable than the values determined by other methods.

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065