期刊导航

论文摘要

基于射频识别系统RFID动态时隙算法的经济性研究

The Economy of Dynamic Anti-collision Algorithm Analysis Based on RFID System

作者:刘齐宏(四川大学);李天德(四川大学 经济学院,四川 成都610064);周志斌(西南油气田分公司,四川 成都610051);易彬(泸州老窖股份有限公司,四川 泸州646000);刘齐巍(四川大学 经济学院,四川 成都610064)

Author:Liu Qi-Hong(SICHUAN UNIVERSITY);李天德();周志斌();易彬();刘齐巍()

收稿日期:2008-07-16          年卷(期)页码:2009,41(6):183-186

期刊名称:工程科学与技术

Journal Name:Advanced Engineering Sciences

关键字:射频识别;EPC Gen2;反碰撞算法;动态帧时隙算法

Key words:RFID;EPC Gen2;anti-collision algorithm;dynamic frame time slot algorithm

基金项目:四川省科技攻关项目(2006Z01-027);四川省科技支撑计划资助项目(07GG006-025)

中文摘要

为了解决传统ALOHA算法, 当标签数量增加时,访问标签所需要时隙数成指数增加的问题,提出了一种新的帧时隙改进算法(EDFSA),该算法吸收了动态帧时隙算法的优点,解决了系统标签数量变得很大时,系统效率就开始降低的问题。通过对帧长度和M的取值做了一些限定,能够使系统性能相应地提高。通过系统仿真实验,比较EDFSA、BFSA、DFSA 3种算法性能的优劣。当识别1000个RFID标签的时候,EDFSA算法相比BFSA算法和DFSA算法的性能分别提高85%和92%,如果RFID标签数目更多,则EDFSA将会得到更好的性能。

英文摘要

To solve the problem which the interval number of accessing label will increase by exponent when the number of label increases for the traditional ALOHA algorithm, a new algorithm about frame time interval upswing algorithm was put forward. This new algorithm absorbed the strongpoint of the dynamic time interval algorithm and the problem which the system efficiency begin debases when the number of system label became quite big was solved. The system capability was enhanced accordingly, through limiting the value of length of frame and M. The advantage and disadvantage of the performance of three algorithm (EDFSA, BFSA and DFSA) were compared through the simulation experiment. It was concluded that time cost of EDFSA algorithm increased 85% and 92% comparing respectively with the BFSA algorithm and the DFSA algorithm when identifying 1000 tags,and higher efficiency of EDFSA algorithms will be obtained when identifying more tags.

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065