英美法律隐喻研究述评
A Comment on Legal Metaphors in the Common Law System
作者：杨德祥;
Author：
收稿日期： 年卷（期）页码：2012,(02):-125-133
期刊名称：四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
Journal Name：Journal of Sichuan University (Social Science Edition）
关键字：英美法系;隐喻;说服
Key words：
基金项目：
中文摘要
从英美法系法律隐喻的研究现状入手,通过对法律隐喻话语作用的阐述,分析了法律隐喻五个方面的说服功能,指出了其所具有的意识形态功能。法官选择法律隐喻这种话语结构,其实就是拥有权利和占支配地位的社会群体通过对话语的操纵,将自己对社会真实的解释和社会真实的特定意义加之于其他社会群体的能力,因此法律是隐喻成为社会现实的重要语境,隐喻是实现法律话语说服功能的重要手段之一。
参考文献
①束定芳:《隐喻学研究》,上海:上海外语教育出版社,2003年,第1-2页。
②Mark Johnson,Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor,Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,1981,p.12.
③David T.Ritchie,“Who is on the Outside Looking in,and What do They See?Metaphors of Exclusion in Legal Educa-tion,”MERCER Law Review,Vol.58,2007,p.991.
④See Thomas Ross,“Metaphor and Paradox,”Geogia Law Review,Vol.23,1989,pp.1053-1057.
⑤See Thomas Ross,Metaphor and Paradox,pp.1053,1057.
⑥Jeremy Bentham,The Theory of Legislation,C.K.Ogden ed.,1931,p.69.
⑦Berkey v.Third Ave.R.R.Co.,155 N.E.58,61(N.Y.1926).
⑧Lon L.Fuller,Legal Fictions,Stanford:Stanford University Press,1967,p.121.
①Ibid.
②Robert Tsai,supra note 5.
③Ibid.,p.5.
④Stephen L.Carter,“Religious Freedom as if Religion Matters:A Tribute to Justice Brennan,”California Law Review,Vol.87,1999,pp.1059-1063.
⑤Patricia Loughlan,“Pirates,Parasites,Reapers,Sowers,Fruits,Foxes:The Metaphors of Intellectual Property,”Sydney Law Review,Vol.28,2006,pp.211-216.
⑥Benjamin L.Berger,“Rhetoric,Innovation,and the Juridical Text,”Canada Court Review,Vol.39,2002,pp.30-37.
⑦Bernard J.Hibbittis,“Making Sense of Metaphor:Visuality,Aurality,and the Reconfiguration of American Legal Dis-course,”Cardozo Law Review,Vol.16,1994,p.229.
⑧See Robert Tsai,supra note 5.
⑨See Bernard J.Hibbittis,supra note 16.
Steven Winter,“The Metaphor of Standing and the Problem of Self-Governance,”Stanford Law Review,Vol.40,1988,p.1371.
①Jonathan Blavin&Glenn Cohen,“Gore,Gibson,and Goldsmith:The Evolution of Internet Metaphors in Law andCommentary,”Harvard Journal of Law&Technology,Vol.16,2002,p.265.
②Clay Calvert,“Regulating Cyberspace:Metaphor,Rhetoric,Reality and the Framing of Legal Options,”HastingsCommunications and Entertainment Law Journal,Vol.20,1998,p.541.
③Adam Arms,“Metaphor,Women and Law,”Hastings Women's Law Journal,Vol.10,1999,p.257.
④Elizabeth Thornburg,“Metaphors Matter:How Images of Battle,Sports and Sex Shape the Adversary System,”Wis-consin Women’s Law Journal,Vol.10,1995,p.225.
⑤See Michael R.Smith,“Levels of Metaphor in Persuasive Legal Writing,”Mercer Law Review,Vol.58,2007,p.919.
⑥See Benjamin L.Berger,supra note 15.
⑦参见束定芳:《隐喻学研究》,第135页。
⑧Matthew J.McCloskey,“Visualizing The Law:Methods for Mapping the Legal Landscape and Drawing Analogies,”Washington Law Review,Vol.73,1998,p.163.
⑨Lucas v.Earl.281 U.S.111,114-115(1930).
See Matthew J.McCloskey,supra note 28.
①See George Lakoff&Mark Johnson,Metaphors We Live By,Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980,p.143.
③Schenck v.United States.249 U.S.47(1919).
④Gitlow v.New York.268 U.S.652,654-655(1925).
⑤Piotr Cap,“Proximation:A Methodological Account of Legitimization Strategies in the Post-9/11 US Political Dis-course,”from http://www.oocities.org/strus_pl/WaronTerror.pdf,2011-3-21.
①Teun A.van Dijk,“Politics Ideology and Discourse,”Retrieved from http://www.discourse-in-society.org/teun.html.
②Patricia Loughlan.supra note 14,at 5.
③任绍曾:《概念隐喻及其语篇体现》,《外语与外语教学》2006年第2期。
④Raymond W.Gibbs,“Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world,”in Raymond W.Gibbs,Gerard J.Steen,eds.,Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics.John Benjamins,Amsterdam,1999,pp.145–166.
①J.M.Balkin&Sanford Levinson,“Law as Performance,”in Michael Freeman&Andrew D.E.Lewis eds.,LAWAND LITERATURE,1999,p.729.
②See Robert Tsai,supra note 5.
①Zillah R.Eisenstein,The Female Body and the Law,Berkeley:University of California Press,1988,pp.125-137.
②William E.Connolly,The Terms of Political Discourse,New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1983,pp.152-154.
③N.Fairclough&R.Wodak,,“Critical Discourse Analysis,”in van Dijk.(ed.)Discourse as Social Interaction,1997,pp.271-280.
④Teun A.van Dijk,“Ideology and Discourse Analysis,”Journal of Political Ideologies,2006,Vol.11,pp.115-140.
⑤约翰.M.康莉、威廉.M.欧巴尔:《法律、语言和权力》,程朝阳译,北京:法律出版社2007年,第189页。
⑥Pierre Bourdieu,“The Force of Law:Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field,”Hastings Law Journal,Vol.38,1987,p.805.
①George Lakoff,“Women,Fire,and Dangerous Things:What Categories Reveal about the Mind,”in Frames and theSemantics of Understanding by Charles Fillmore,1987,pp.489-490.
②Antonio Gramsci,Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci,New York:International Publishers,1971,p.215.
③Austin Sarat&Susan Silbey,“The Pull of the Policy Audience,”Law&Policy,Vol.10,1988,p.97.
④David Kairys,The Politics of Law:A Progressive Critique,New York:Pantheon,1990,p.173.
①Andrew Ortony,Metaphor and Thought,2nd edition,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993,p.243.
【关闭】
