①“Implications of a Possible Chinese Communist Attack on Foreign Colonies in South China,July 15,1949,”in Paul Kesaris,ed.,Documents of the National Security Council,Third Supplement,Frederick:University Publications of America,1985,Reel 1.
②相关研究成果参见刘存宽:《1942年关于香港新界问题的中英交涉》,《抗日战争研究》1991年第1期;冯仲平:《论战后英国在香港问题上的态度》,《世界历史》1993年第4期;李世安:《1943年中英废除不平等条约的谈判和香港问题》,《历史研究》1993年第5期;陶文钊:《太平洋战争期间的香港问题》,《历史研究》1994年第5期;高岱:《战后香港归属权之争述论》,《南京大学学报》(哲学、人文、社会科学版)1994年第2期;田跃安、魏纹:《太平洋战争时期中国收回香港主权斗争的失败及历史教训》,《西北大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)1994年第3期;张宝善:《“二战”期间中英关于香港归属斗争中的蒋介石》,《南京社会科学》1994年第4期;刘存宽、刘蜀永:《1949年以前中国政府收复香港的尝试》,《历史研究》1997年第3期;关绍纪:《关于香港回归问题的历史回顾(1942—1945)》,《东岳论坛》1997年第2期;陈晋文:《论中英香港问题的交涉(1927—1945)》,《民国档案》1997年第2期;于群、程舒伟:《美国的香港政策,1942—1960》,《历史研究》1997年第3期;刘存宽:《中国收回香港的历史考察》,《广东社会科学》1997年第3期;李秀领:《四十年代的中英香港问题交涉》,《江苏社会科学》1997年第3期;郭又新、刘大平:《美国亚洲战略中的香港问题(1943—1949)》,《东北师大学报》(哲学社会科学版)1997年第4期;周乾:《论二战后期中英美围绕香港战后地位问题的交涉与斗争》,《安徽史学》2003年第6期;陶文钊、杨奎松、王建朗:《抗日战争时期中国对外关系》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009年;余绳武、刘蜀永主编:《二十世纪的香港》,香港:麒麟书业有限公司,1995年;刘蜀永主编:《简明香港史》,香港:三联书店(香港)有限公司,1998年;William Roger Louis,Imperialism at Bay:The United States and the Decolonization of the British Empire,1941-1945,New York:Oxford University Press,1978;Nancy Bernkoph Tucker,Taiwan,Hong Kong and the United States,1945-1992:Uncertain Friendships,New York:Twayne Publishers,1994;Andrew J.Whitfield,Hong Kong,Empire and the Anglo-American Alliance at War,1941-1945,New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2001;Chi-Kwan Mark,Hong Kong and the Cold War:Anglo-American Relations,1949-1957,Oxford:Clarendon Press,2004;Chan Lau Kit-Ching,“The Hong Kong Question during the Pacific War(1941-1945),”The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History,Vol.2,No.1,1973;Chan Lau Kit-Ching,“The Abrogation of British Extraterritoriality in China 1942-1943:A Study of Anglo-American-Chinese Relations,”Modern Asian Studies,Vol.11,No.2,1977;Chan Lau Kit-Ching,“The United States and the Question of Hong Kong,1941-1945,”Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society,Vol.19,1979;William Roger Louis,“Hong Kong:The Critical Phase,1945-1949,”The American Historical Review,Vol.102,No.4,1997.
①这些政府部门包括国务院—战争部—海军部协调委员会(State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee,下文简称“部际协调委员会”)、临时研究与情报局(Interim Research and Intelligence Service)、商务部国内外贸易局远东司(Department of Commerce,Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce,Far Eastern Unit)、国务卿幕僚委员会(Secretarys Staff Committee)等。文章涉及相应部门之处,将对其职能进行简要介绍。
②陶文钊:《中美关系史(1911—1949)》(上卷),上海:上海人民出版社,2004年,第345页。
③相关文献为数众多,此处仅举几例以为参考。参见陈志奇编:《中华民国外交史料汇编》(第11卷),台北:渤海堂文化公司,1996年,第5272页;Norman Thomas,“Foreign Policy Planks of the Major Parties,”Human Events,Vol.1,1944,pp.93-94;Nathaniel Peffer,“Southeastern Asia in Escrow,”Foreign Affairs,Vol.20,No.3,1942,pp.510,516;Nathaniel Peffer,“What We Want in the Far East,”Harpers Magazine,Vol.185,No.1105,1942,pp.100-101;Walter Lippmann,“The Post-Singapore War in the East,”Washington Post,February 21,1942,p.9;Jan Henrik Marsman,“I Escaped from Hong Kong,”The Saturday Evening Post,June 6,1942,pp.9-10,60-66;June 13,1942,pp.14-15,38,40-42,44-46;June 20,1942,pp.22-23,49,51,54,56;“Hong Kong Priests Heard Massacre,”New York Times,July27,1942,p.5;Joseph Alsop,“City in Prison,”The Saturday Evening Post,September 1,1943,p.12.
④于群、程舒伟:《美国的香港政策,1942—1960》;郭又新、刘大平:《美国亚洲战略中的香港问题(1943—1949)》。
⑤高岱:《战后香港归属权之争述论》,第110页;关绍纪:《关于香港回归问题的历史回顾(1942—1945)》,第77页;周乾:《论二战后期中英美围绕香港战后地位问题的交涉与斗争》,第64页。
⑥Tucker,Taiwan,Hong Kong and the United States,p.232;Warren I.Cohen and Li Zhao,Hong Kong under Chinese Rule:The Economic and Political Implications of Reversion,New York:Cambridge University Press,1997,p.1.
⑦Kit-Ching,“The Hong Kong Question during the Pacific War(1941-1945),”pp.56-57;Kit-Ching,“The Abrogation of British Extraterritoriality in China 1942-1943,”p.285;Kit-Ching,“The United States and the Question of Hong Kong,”p.1;Whitfield,Hong Kong,Empire and the Anglo-American Alliance at War,pp.2-3;Louis,Imperialism at Bay,pp.7,550;Louis,“Hong Kong,”p.1063.
①参见冯仲平:《论战后英国在香港问题上的态度》;Tucker,Taiwan,Hong Kong and the United States,pp.199,232.
②参见余绳武、刘蜀永主编:《二十世纪的香港》,第221页;刘蜀永主编:《简明香港史》,第226页;张顺洪等:《大英帝国的瓦解——英国的非殖民化与香港问题》,北京:社会科学文献出版社,1997年,第193页;郭又新、刘大平:《美国亚洲战略中的香港问题(1943—1949)》;于群、程舒伟:《美国的香港政策,1942—1960》;高岱:《战后香港归属权之争述论》;周乾:《论二战后期中英美围绕香港战后地位问题的交涉与斗争》;李秀领:《四十年代的中英香港问题交涉》;Chan Lau Kit-Ching,China,Britain and Hong Kong,1895-1945,Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press,1990,pp.316,321,323;Whitfield,Hong Kong,Empire and the Anglo-American Alliance At War,pp.163,170,182,212-214;Louis,Imperialism at Bay,pp.532-539,568;Kit-Ching,“The Hong Kong Question during the Pacific War(1941-1945),”pp.56-57;Kit-Ching,“The United States and the Question of Hong Kong,”pp.5,12,15,16;Chan Lau Kit-Ching,“Symbolism as Diplomacy:The United States and Britains China Policy during the First Year of the Pacific War,”Diplomacy&Statecraft,Vol.16,No.1,2005,pp.75,78-88;Louis,“Hong Kong,”p.1063.
③部际协调委员会成立于1944年底,成员以国务院、战争部、海军部助理部长及以上级别官员为主。委员会下设若干小组委员会作为研究工作的实际操作单元,其中涉港军事—政治问题交由远东小组委员会负责,该小组组长即为范宣德本人。委员会的职责是在国务卿、陆军部长和海军部长的领导下,对指派的政治—军事问题制定政策并提供建议,供总统参考或批准。其地区研究与政策设计文本综合了重要决策部门的主要意见,基本上全面代表了军方和国务院的共同认知与政策取向。参见Department of State,The Department of State Bulletin(下文简称The Bulletin),Vol.13,No.333,No.339,Washington D.C.:GPO,1945,pp.745-747,645;U.S.Senate,Committee on Naval Affairs,Unification of the War and Navy Departments and Postwar Organization for National Security,79thCongress,1stSession,Washington:GPO,1945,pp.51-54;Department of State,Foreign Relations of the United States(下文简称FRUS),1944,Vol.1,Washington:GPO,1966,p.1469.
④Department of State,FRUS,1945,Vol.7,pp.37-39;“Politico-Military Problems in the Far East:Treatment by U.S.Occupation Force of Special Areas:Hong Kong,June 14,1945,Annex to Appendix‘A’,”in Martin P.Claussen,ed.,State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee Policy Files,1944-1947(下文简称SWNCC Case Files),Wilmington:Scholarly Resources Inc.,1977,Reel 11.
⑤“Treatment by United States Occupation Forces of Special Areas:Hong Kong:Report by the Department of State,May 12,1945,”in Claussen,ed.,SWNCC Case Files,Reel 11;蒋中正:《中国之命运》,南京:正中书局,1946年,第128-129页。
⑥The National Archives,Federal Records of World War II,Vol.II,Military Agencies,Washington D.C.:GPO,1951,pp.2-6.
⑦“Letter from Sir G.Gater to Sir A.Cadogan(Berlin),No.54144/38/45[F.O.934/3/12(18)],Colonial Office,July 28,1945,”in Rohan Butler and M.E.Pelly,eds.,Documents on British Policy Overseas,Series I,Vol.I,London:Her Majestys Stationery Office,1984,p.1185;“Treatment by United States Occupation Forces of Special Areas.”
①“Treatment by United States Occupation Forces of Special Areas.”
②“Treatment by United States Occupation Forces of Special Areas.”
③“Politico-Military Problems in the Far East:Treatment by United States Occupation Forces of Special Areas:Hong Kong,May 14,1945,SWNCC 111/1/D,”in Claussen,ed.,SWNCC Case Files,Reel 11.
④“Politico-Military Problems in the Far East:Treatment by U.S.Occupation Force of Special Areas:Hong Kong,June14,1945,SWNCC 111/2,”in Claussen,ed.,SWNCC Case Files,Reel 11.
⑤“Politico-Military Problems in the Far East:Treatment by United States Occupation Forces of Special Areas:Hong Kong,August 8,1945,SWNCC 111/3/D,”in Claussen,ed.,SWNCC Case Files,Reel 11.
⑥“Politico-Military Problems in the Far East:Treatment by U.S.Occupation Force of Special Areas:Hong Kong,June14,1945,SWNCC 111/2.”
⑦Department of State,FRUS,1945,Vol.7,p.120.
⑧Whitfield,Hong Kong,Empire and the Anglo-American Alliance at War,1941-1945,p.196.
⑨Department of State,FRUS,1945,Vol.7,pp.505,509;“Memorandum for the President:Message to Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek regarding Japanese Surrender at Hong Kong,August 21,1945,”in Paul Kesaris,ed.,The Presidential Documents Series:Map Room Messages of President Truman(1945-1946),Frederick:University Publications of America,1980,Reel 1.
①H.G.Nicholas,ed.,Washington Despatches,1941-1945:Weekly Political Reports from the British Embassy,Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1981,pp.607-608.
②“The Future Status of Hong Kong,October 5,1945,”in Paul Kesaris,ed.,OSS/State Department Intelligence and Research Reports,Part II,Postwar Japan,Korea,and Southeast Asia,Washington D.C.:University Publications of America,1977,Reel 1;“The Economic Importance of Hong Kong,October 15,1945,”in Office of Chinese Affairs,Records of the Office of Chinese Affairs,1945-1955(以下简称ROCA),Wilmington:Scholarly Resources,1989,Reel 6.
③临时研究与情报局成立于1945年10月,隶属美国国务院,主要接管战略情报局(Office of Strategic Services)的研究与分析职能,负责评估海外情报并提供情报评估报告,报告内容大多围绕政治与外交事务。参见Harry Truman:“Executive Order:Termination of the Office of Strategic Services and Disposition of Its Functions,September 20,1945,”https:∥www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol37no3/html/v37i3a 10p_0001.htm.
④国内外贸易局成立于1912年,隶属美国商务部,除了根据职能分设统计、编辑、商业情报等部门之外,还依据地区设立拉美司、远东司、西欧司等部门,负责跟踪了解这些地区的整体经济形势。贸易局往往通过多种渠道获取海外经济情报,包括本局驻地代表、外国官方报告、美国驻外使领馆等等。参见Laurence F.Schmeisser and Gustavus A.Weber,The Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce:Its History,Activities,and Organization,Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins Press,1924,pp.1,28-33,39-41,43,46,49,86;United States,Consulate(Hong Kong),R.G.84,Hong Kong Post,State Department,Select Records,Washington D.C.:National Archives,1976.
⑤“The Future Status of Hong Kong”;“Factors Influencing the Postwar Status of Hong Kong and Macao,October 15,1945,”in Kesaris,ed.,OSS/State Department Intelligence and Research Reports,Part II,Postwar Japan,Korea,and Southeast Asia,Reel 1;“The Economic Importance of Hong Kong.”
⑥二战后期,美国政府为了更加有效地制定、执行对外政策,对国务院的组织、职能进行系统重组,国务卿幕僚委员会就是这次重组过程中建立的协调领导机构之一。委员会负责协助国务卿确定短、长期对外政策,是权力最为广泛的对外政策与国际关系顾问机构。参见“Departmental Order 1301 of December 20,1944,”in Department of State,The Bulletin,Vol.11,No.286,Washington D.C.:GPO,1944,p.779.
⑦下文简称《飞地政策》。参见“The Policy of the United States in Regard to Foreign Enclaves in China,December18,1945,”in Office of Chinese Affairs,ROCA,Reel 6.
⑧“Policy and Information Statement:Hong Kong,March 19,1946,”in Office of Chinese Affairs,ROCA,Reel 6.
⑨“The Future Status of Hong Kong”;“Factors Influencing the Postwar Status of Hong Kong and Macao”;“The Economic Importance of Hong Kong.”
①飞地这一概念最早出现在1526年签订的《马德里条约》(Treaty of Madrid)之中。1868年,英语国家的外交语汇采纳了这一表述方式。其语义取自拉丁语inclavatus一词,原意为“封锁”。英语中的“飞地”一词直译成汉语泛指“被包围的领土”。参见Evgeny Vinokurov,A Theory of Enclaves,Lanham:Lexington Books,2007,pp.9-10;C.dOlivier Farran,“International Enclaves and the Question of State Servitudes,”The International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.4,No.2,1955,p.295.
②参见Vinokurov,A Theory of Enclaves,pp.9-10.
③Farran,“International Enclaves and the Question of State Servitudes,”p.295.
④“The Policy of the United States in Regard to Foreign Enclaves in China.”
⑤Department of State,FRUS,1948,Vol.7,Washington:GPO,1973,p.47.
⑥“Implications of a Possible Chinese Communist Attack on Foreign Colonies in South China.”
⑦于群、程舒伟:《美国的香港政策,1942—1960》,第57-59页;郭又新、刘大平:《美国亚洲战略中的香港问题(1943—1949)》,第28-29页。
⑧“The Policy of the United States in Regard to Foreign Enclaves in China.”
①Department of State,FRUS,1948,Vol.8,Washington:GPO,1973,pp.146-155.
②“A Report to the National Security Council by the Secretary of State on United States Policy Regarding Trade with China,February 28,1949,”in Paul Kesaris,ed.,Documents of the National Security Council,1947-1977,Washington D.C.:University Publications of America,1980,Reel 1.
③Department of State,FRUS,1949,Vol.9,Washington:GPO,1974,pp.835-836.
④论及美国对港禁运政策的研究成果,参见于群、程舒伟:《美国的香港政策,1942—1960》;郭又新、刘大平:《美国亚洲战略中的香港问题(1943—1949)》;陶文钊:《禁运与反禁运:五十年代中美关系中的一场严重斗争》,《中国社会科学》1997年第3期;郭又新:《1949—1954年美国对香港的经济防卫政策》,《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》2000年第6期;王永华:《1950—1954年美英对香港禁运的历史考察》,《延安大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第2期;张曙光:《美国关于经济制裁的战略思考与对华禁运决策(1949—1953年),《国际政治研究》2008年第3期;Yoko Yasuhara,“Japan,Communist China,and Export Controls in Asia,1948-1952,”Diplomatic History,Vol.10,No.1,1986;Frank Cain,“The US-Led Trade Embargo on China:The Origins of CHINCOM,1947-1952,”Journal of Strategic Studies,Vol.18,No.4,1995;Qing Simei,“The Eisenhower Administration and Changes in Western Embargo Policy against China,1954-1958,”in Warren I.Cohen&Akira Iriye,eds.,The Great Powers in East Asia,1953-1960,New York:Columbia University Press,1990;Burton I.Kaufman,“Eisenhowers Foreign Economic Policy with Respect to East Asia,”in Cohen&Iriye,eds.,The Great Powers in East Asia;Shu Guang Zhang,Economic Cold War:Americas Embargo against China and the Sino-Soviet Alliance,1949-1963,Stanford:Stanford University Press,2001;Catherine R.Schenk,Hong Kong as an International Financial Centre:Emergence and Development,1945-1965,London:Routledge,2002;Lawrence Mills,Protecting Free Trade:The Hong Kong Paradox,1947-1997,Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press,2012.
⑤Kenneth I.Juster,“Asian Security and Hong Kongs Role in the War on Global Terrorism,April 28,2003,”Speech at the Conference of the Center for Strategic and International Studies,http:∥www.bis.doc.gov/news/2003/hongkongjusterspeech4_28.htm.
⑥美国对港禁运政策曾对香港造成严重的负面影响,相关研究参见Theodore Geiger&Frances M.Geiger,The Development Progress of Hong Kong and Singapore,London:Macmillan Press,Ltd.,p.67;Cheuk-Wah Chan,“Hong Kong and Its Strategic Values for China and Britain(1949-1968),”Journal of Contemporary Asia,Vol.28,No.3,1998,pp.350,353,360;James T.H.Tang,“From Empire Defence to Imperial Retreat:Britains Postwar China Policy and the Decolonization of Hong Kong,”Modern Asian Studies,Vol.28,No.2,1994,p.332.
⑦“Policy and Information Statement.”
①“U.S.Policy on Hong Kong,July 17,1957,”in Declassified Documents Reference System(DDRS),Farmington Hills:Gale,http:∥galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/DDRS.
②参见United States,Consulate(Hong Kong),R.G.84,Hong Kong Post,State Department,Select Records.
③1945年10月,杜鲁门政府解散了美国历史上的第一个现代情报机构——战略情报局(Office of Strategic Services—OSS),将其秘密情报部门(Secret Intelligence Branch—SI)和反间谍部门(Counter Espionage Branch—X-2)合并重组为战略情报处,交由陆军部接管。1947年美国国会通过《国家安全法》,中央情报局由此继承了战略情报处的部分职能。参见Department of State,FRUS,1945-1950,Retrospective Volume,Emergence of the Intelligence Establishments,Washington:GPO,1996,pp.235-236;Donald P.Steury,ed.,On the Front Lines of the Cold War:Documents on the Intelligence War in Berlin,1946 to 1961,Washington D.C.:GPO,1999,https:∥www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/on-the-front-lines-of-the-cold-war-documents-on-the-intelligence-war-in-berlin-1946-to-1961/art-3.html#rft4.
④“Policy and Information Statement.”
⑤U.S.,Consulate General(Hong Kong),Review of Hong Kong Chinese Press,Washington D.C.:Library of Congress Photoduplication Service,1947-1961;U.S.,Consulate General(Hong Kong),Survey of China Mainland Press,New Haven:Yale University Photographic Services,1950-1973.
⑥MarkHong Kong and the Cold Warpp.36-37.
⑦“U.S.Policy on Hong Kong,July 17,1957”,“U.S.Policy on Hong Kong,June 11,1960,”in Kesaris,ed.,Documents of the National Security Council:Fourth Supplement,Frederick:University Publications of America,1987,Reel 3.
⑧“Implications of a Possible Chinese Communist Attack on Foreign Colonies in South China.”
①“The Future Status of Hong Kong”;“The Economic Importance of Hong Kong.”
②“Telegram from N.Novikov,Soviet Ambassador to the US,to the Soviet Leadership,September 27,1946,”in Woodrow Wilson Center,Virtual Archive Collection from Cold War International History Project(CWIHP),http:∥www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?topic_id=1409&fuseaction=va2.browse&sort=Collection;“The Policy of the United States in Regard to Foreign Enclaves in China.”
③“Factors Influencing the Postwar Status of Hong Kong and Macao”;“The Future Status of Hong Kong”;“The Economic Importance of Hong Kong.”
④“The Policy of the United States in Regard to Foreign Enclaves in China.”
⑤“Factors Influencing the Postwar Status of Hong Kong and Macao”;“The Economic Importance of Hong Kong”;“The Future Status of Hong Kong.”
⑥“Factors Influencing the Postwar Status of Hong Kong and Macao”;“The Future Status of Hong Kong.”
①Aron Shai,Britain and China,1941-1947:Imperial Momentum,London:The Macmillan Press,1984,pp.119-120.
②国家民意研究中心成立于1941年,是全美成立时间最早、规模最大、依托大学的非盈利性民意研究机构,因战时民意调查声名鹊起。参见Paul J.Lavrakas,“National Opinion Research Center(NORC),”in P.Lavrakas,ed.,Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods,Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications,2008,pp.506-507;Norman M.Bradburn and James A.Davis,“The Place of NORC in the Development of Survey Research in the U.S.,”http:∥www.norc.org/PDFs/Events/ASA/ASA_Presentation_Bradburn.pdf.
③“The Economic Importance of Hong Kong.”
④“Treatment by United States Occupation Forces of Special Areas.”
⑤Arnold Wright,H.A.Cartwright,eds.,Twentieth-Century Impressions of Hongkong,Shanghai,and Other Treaty Ports of China,London:Lloyds Greater Britain Publishing Co.,1908,pp.203,213-214;Elizabeth Sinn,Pacific Crossing:California Gold,Chinese Migration,and the Making of Hong Kong,Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press,2013,pp.138,145,148;Elizabeth Sinn,“Preparing Opium for America:Hong Kong and Cultural Consumption in the Chinese Diaspora,”Journal of Chinese Overseas,Vol.1,No.1,2005,p.29;“The Economic Importance of Hong Kong.”
⑥“The Economic Importance of Hong Kong.”
⑦“Factors Influencing the Postwar Status of Hong Kong and Macao.”
①“The Economic Importance of Hong Kong”;“The Future Status of Hong Kong”;“Factors Influencing the Postwar Status of Hong Kong and Macao.”
②“Factors Influencing the Postwar Status of Hong Kong and Macao.”
③Department of State,FRUS,1937,Vol.4,Washington:GPO,1954,p.137;Department of State,FRUS,1938,Vol.3,Washington:GPO,1954,p.215;Department of State,FRUS,1931-1941,Vol.2,Washington:GPO,1943,pp.301-302;Department of State,FRUS,1941,Vol.4,Washington:GPO,1954,pp.795,797,815.
④“Factors Influencing the Postwar Status of Hong Kong and Macao.”
①“Politico-Military Problems in the Far East:Treatment by U.S.Occupation Force of Special Areas:Hong Kong,June14,1945.”
②罗斯福总统曾要求国民政府收回香港后将其开辟为“自由港”。参见吴景平、郭岱君编:《宋子文驻美时期电报选(1940—1943)》,上海:复旦大学出版社,2008年,第202-203、534-535页;吴景平、郭岱君编:《风云际会——宋子文与外国人士会谈记录(1940—1949)》,上海:复旦大学出版社,2010年,第46、320页;中央研究院近代史研究所编:《王世杰日记》(第四册),台北:中央研究院近代史研究所,1990年,第43-44页。
①Walter M.Lowrie,Memoirs of the Rev.Walter M.Lowrie:Missionary to China,New York:Robert Carter&Brothers,1850,pp.205-206;何心平:《美国天主教传教会与香港》,香港:香港中文大学出版社,2011年,第31、77-78页。
