麦金太尔的善观念批判
A Criticism on MacIntyres Concept of Good
作者:姚大志;
Author:
收稿日期: 年卷(期)页码:2013,(01):-14-19
期刊名称:四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
Journal Name:Journal of Sichuan University (Social Science Edition)
关键字:麦金太尔;社群主义;政治哲学;善
Key words:
基金项目:教育部重点研究基地重大项目“分配正义研究”(项目批准号为12JJD710011)
中文摘要
在麦金太尔的理论体系中,善观念占有第一的位置。但是他所说的善是指什么?这是一个很难回答的问题,因为麦金太尔只有德性理论,而没有关于善的理论。但是,麦金太尔的德性理论为探讨这个问题提供了线索:由于他的德性理论以善观念为前提,从而可以从他的德性理论推论他的善观念。他的善观念可以分为三个层面,即内在于实践的善、个人生活的善以及共同体的善。
参考文献
①Thomas D.DAndrea,Tradition,Rationality,and Virtue:The Thought of Alasdair MacIntyre,Hampshire,UK:Ashgate Publishing Limited,2006,p.258.
②Alasdair MacIntyre,After Virtue,Notre Dame,Indiana:University of Notre Dame Press,second edition,1984,pp.186-187.
③Alasdair MacIntyre,After Virtue,Notre Dame,Indiana:University of Notre Dame Press,second edition,1984,pp.188-189.
①Alasdair MacIntyre,After Virtue,Notre Dame,Indiana:University of Notre Dame Press,second edition,1984,pp.179-180,p.196.
②David Miller,“Virtues,Practices and Justice,”in John Horton and Susan Mendus,eds.,After MacIntyre,Cambridge,UK:Polity Press,1994,pp.250-251.
③Alasdair MacIntyre,“A Partial Response to My Critics,”in Horton and Mendus,eds.,After MacIntyre,p.286.
①Miller,“Virtues,Practices and Justice,”p.248.
②D'Andrea,Tradition,Rationality,and Virtue,p.295.
③MacIntyre,After Virtue,p.208.
④MacIntyre,After Virtue,p.217.
①MacIntyre,After Virtue,p.219.
②MacIntyre,After Virtue,p.220.
③Peter Johnson,“Reclaiming the Aristotelian Ruler,”in Horton and Mendus,eds.,After MacIntyre,p.58.
①MacIntyre,After Virtue,p.220.
②MacIntyre,After Virtue,p.229.
③D'Andrea,Tradition,Rationality,and Virtue,p.272.
④Philip Pettit,“Liberal/Communitarian:MacIntyres Mesmeric Dichotomy,”in Horton and Mendus,eds.,After MacIntyre,p.181.
①MacIntyre,After Virtue,pp.162-163.
【关闭】