多元文化与犍陀罗艺术:再论贵霜时代佛教和佛教艺术的发展
Multi-cultures and the Gandhāra Art: a Further Discussion on the Development of the Buddhism and Buddhist art in the Kushan Empire
作者：庞霄骁;
Author：
收稿日期： 年卷（期）页码：2017,213(06):-74-81
期刊名称：四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
Journal Name：Journal of Sichuan University (Social Science Edition）
关键字：多元文化;犍陀罗艺术;贵霜帝国
Key words：
基金项目：国家社会科学基金重大项目“希腊化文明与丝绸之路”(15ZDB059)
中文摘要
长期以来,关于犍陀罗艺术的起源问题,学者们围绕"希腊起源说""罗马起源说""本土起源说""伊朗起源说"和"塞人起源说"等观点争执不下。因此,有必要提出一种新的研究视角,即贵霜帝国时期的多元文化并存与融合才是犍陀罗艺术起源与发展的关键因素之一。作为文化相对落后的游牧民族,贵霜人善于吸收其他文化的成果并加以融合,虽然其目的是为了巩固自身统治,但客观上却为佛教艺术吸收希腊化文化以及琐罗亚斯德教和贵霜本族传统等因素提供了便利的条件。这也是上述各种关于犍陀罗艺术起源的观点得以存在的基础。
参考文献
(1)A.Cunningham,Report for the Years 1872-73,Vol.5,New Delhi:Archaeological Survey of India,1874,p.123.
(2)A.Cunningham,The St0pa of Bharhut:A Buddhist Monument Ornamented with Numerous Sculptures Illustrative of Buddhist Legend and History in the Third Century B.C.,London:W.H.Allen and Co.,1879,pp.27-29.
(3)A.Gruwedel,Buddhist Art of India,Trans.by A.C.Gibson,London:Bernard Quaritch,1901,pp.28-74.
(1)A.Foucher,Beginnings of the Buddhist Art and Other Essays in Indian and Central Asia Archology,Trans.by L.A.Thomas and F.W.Thomas,London:Humphrey Milford,1917.译文可参考福歇:《佛教艺术的早期阶段:印度与中亚考古学论文集》,王平先、魏文捷译,兰州:甘肃人民出版社,2008年。
(2)A.Foucher,Lart Greco-Bouddhigue du Gandhāra,Paris:ImprimerieN ationale,1905,p.51.
(3)J.Marshall,The Buddhist Art of Gandhdra:The Story of the Early School,Its Birth,Growth and Decline,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1960.
(4)V.A.Smith,“The Graeco-Roman Influence on the Civilization of Ancient India,”Journal of Asiatic Society of Bengal,Vol.8,No.3,1889,pp.160,172.
(5)B.Rowland,“Gandhāraand Late Antique Art:The Buddha Image,”American Journal of Archaeology,Vol.46,No.2,1942,pp.223-236.
(6)R.E.M.Wheeler,“Romano-Buddhist Art:An Old Problem Restated,”Antiquity,Vol.89,1949,pp.4-19.
(7)A.C.Soper,“The Roman Style in Gandhāra,”American Journal of Archaeology,Vol.55,No.4,1951,pp.301-319.
(8)A.K.Coomaraswamy,“The Origin of the Buddha Image,”Journal of the American Oriental Society,Vol.46,1926,pp.165-170.
(1)可分别参见J·E·范·洛惠泽恩-德·黎乌:《斯基泰时期》,许建英、贾建飞译,昆明:云南人民出版社,2002年,第75页;J.E.Van LohuizenD eleeuw,“New Evidence with Regard to the Origin of the Buddha Image,”South Asian Archaeology:Papers from the Fifth International Conference of the Association of South Asian Archaeologists in Western Europe,Berlin:Museum of Indian Art,1981,pp.377-400.
(2)A.H.Dani,Gandhāra Art in Pakistan,Islamabad:Department of Films&Publications,1951.
(3)J.Cribb,The Origin of the Buddha Image the Numismatic Evidence,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1984,pp.231-244.
(4)A.K.Narain,“First Images of the Buddha and Bodhisattvas:Ideology and Chronology,”Studies in Buddhist Art of South Asia,edited by A.K.Narain,New Delhi:Kanak Publications,1985,pp.88-95.
(5)A.H.Dani,“Origin of the Buddha Image:The Chilas Evidence,”Journal of Central Asia,Vol.26,1987,pp.13-23.
(6)M.Hallade,The Gandhāra Style and the Evolution of Buddhist Art,London:Thames&Hudson,1968.
(7)C.Fabrègues,“The Indo-Parthian Beginnings of Gandhāra Sculpture,”Bulletin of the Asia Institute,New Series,Vol.1,Inaugural Issue,1987,pp.33-43.
(8)田边胜见:《犍陀罗佛和菩萨像起源于伊朗》,台建群选译,《敦煌研究》1989年第3期。
(1)J.Boardman,Greeks in Asia,London:Thames&Hudson,2015,p.167.
(2)E.Raven,“Design Diversity in Kanishka`s Buddha Coins,”in Gandhāra Buddhism:Archaeology,Art,and Texts,edited by Kurt Behrendt and Pia Brancaccio,Vancouver:UBC Press,2006,pp.286-302.
(3)J.Neelis,Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks:Mobility and Exchange within and beyond the Northwestern Borderlands of South Asia,Leiden:Brill,2011,pp.133-134.
(4)季羡林等:《大唐西域记校注》,北京:中华书局,1985年,第335-336页。
(5)The Mahāva爞sa or the Great Chronicle of Ceylon,trans.by Wilhelm Geiger and Mabel Haynes Bode,London:Pali Text Society,1912.汉译本可参考摩诃那摩等:《大史---斯里兰卡佛教史(上)》,韩廷杰译,高雄:佛光文化事业有限公司,1996年,第30-53页。
(6)J.Marshall,Taxila:An Illustrated Account of Archaeological Excavations,Carried out at Taxila under the Orders of the Government of India between the Years 1913 and 1934,Vol.2,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1951,p.788.
(7)D.Jongeward,Joe Cribb and Peter Donovan,Kushan,Kushano-Sasanian,and Kidaritecoins:A Catalogue of Coins from the American Numismatic Society,New York:The American Numismatic Society,2015,pp.57-64.
(1)季羡林等:《大唐西域记校注》,第331-334页。
(2)吕澂:《印度佛学源流略讲》,上海:上海人民出版社,2005年,第46-56页。
(3)H.Loeschner,“The Stūpa of the Kushan Emper or Kanishka the Great,with Comments on the Azes Era and Kushan Chronology,”in Victor H.Mair,ed.,Sino-Platonic Papers,Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia,Number 227,July,2012.
(4)慧皎:《高僧传》,汤用彤校注、汤一玄整理,北京:中华书局,1992年,第10-11页。
(5)A.L.Basham:A Culture History of India,New Delhi:Oxford University Press,1984,pp.93-95.
(6)可参见《付法藏因缘经》《马鸣菩萨传》,《大正新修大藏经》第50卷,东京:一切经刊行会,1924-1934年,第297-322、183-184页。
(7)S.Shrava,Dated Kushana Inscriptions,New Delhi:Pranava Prakashan,1993,pp.4-50,139-148.
(1)Marshall,Taxila,Vol.1,p.15.
(2)Jongeward,Cribb and Donovan,Kushan,Kushano-Sasanian,and Kidaritecoins,p.268.
(3)D.Schlumberger,“The Excavations at Surkh Kotal and the Problem of Hellenism in Bactria and India,”Albert Reckitt Archaeological Lecture,London:Oxford University Press,1961,pp.77-95.
(4)哈尔马塔主编:《中亚文明史》第二卷,徐文堪译,北京:中国对外翻译出版公司,2002年,第333-334页。
(5)W.Ball,The Monuments of Afghanistan:History,Archaeology and Architecture,London and New York:I.B.Tauris&Co Ltd,2008,p.266.
(6)J.Harmata,Fom Hecateus to Al-huwarizmi,Hungary:Union Acacenque International,1984,pp.112-114.
(7)任萌:《塔吉克斯坦、乌兹别克斯坦考古调查:前贵霜时代至后贵霜时代》,《文物》2015年第6期。
(8)哈尔马塔主编:《中亚文明史》第二卷,第224页。
(1)A.Soper,“Aspects of Light Symbolism in Gandhāran Sculpture,”Artbus Asiae,Vol.12,No.4,1949,pp.265-266.
(2)Yu-min Lee,The Maitreya Cult and Its Art in Early China,PH.D.Thesis,Ohio State Univercity,1983,pp.358-394.
(3)V.P.Nikonorov,The Armies of Bactria 700B.C.-450A.D.,Vol.2,Storkport:Montvert Publications,1997,p.64.
(4)B.Rowland,“Graeco-Bactrian Art and Gandhāra:Khalchayan and the Gandhāra Bodhisattvas,”Archives of Asian Art,Vol.25,1971,pp.29-35.
(5)持类似观点的是雷卡·莫里斯(R.Morris),他梳理了苏联学者在中亚佛教遗址的考古活动,虽然其结论并没有明确指明希腊巴克特里亚艺术和犍陀罗艺术的关系如何,但也在某种程度上肯定了希腊巴克特里亚艺术对佛教艺术的影响。参见R.Morris,“Some Observations on Recent Soviet Excavations in Soviet Central Asia and the Problem of Gandhāra Art,”Journal of the American Oriental Society,Vol.103,No.3,1983,pp.557-567.
(6)正如杨巨平教授所说:“如果我们承认犍陀罗艺术中的西方古典因素,事实上就等于承认了希腊文化的作用,因为这些古典艺术因素本质上源于希腊文明,罗马人不过是它的继承者和发扬者而已,而且罗马帝国东部(埃及、叙利亚一带)的罗马人相当一部分实际上就是以前的希腊人或其后裔,政治上他们是罗马帝国的臣民,但在血缘上尤其在文化上他们还是希腊人。他们可能是最早来到印度的所谓‘罗马人’。”参见杨巨平:《远东希腊化文明的文化遗产及其历史定位》,《历史研究》2016年第5期。
(1)田边胜见:《犍陀罗佛和菩萨像起源于伊朗》,《敦煌研究》1989年第3期。
(2)邢义田:《赫拉克利斯在东方---其形象在古代中亚、印度与中国造型艺术中的传播与演变》,载荣新江、李孝聪主编:《中外关系史:新史料与新问题》,北京:科学出版社,2004年,第15-47页。
【关闭】
