语用模块刍议
A Discussion on Pragmatic Modularity
作者：吴晶晶;
Author：
收稿日期： 年卷（期）页码：2015,200(05):-155-160
期刊名称：四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
Journal Name：Journal of Sichuan University (Social Science Edition）
关键字：语用学;心智结构;语用模块;表征关系;计算;组织结构
Key words：
基金项目：
中文摘要
大量语用现象依赖于人脑的认知过程,语用学提供了多种有趣的测试案例以探究潜在的心智,其中颇具影响力的是语用模块论。实际上,对于语用能力和现象是否具有模块化属性,学界一直存在着截然不同的观点。语用模块的支持者无法合理解释依赖于语境的语用信息处理和整合问题,而完全否定语用模块在一定程度上也就否定了语言系统的模块论。但从心智运行机制的表征关系、计算和组织结构三方面着手,用连续、回归等多种信息结构假设解释语用信息处理模式,可以达到认知模块的完全信息整合,构建语用模块的运作机制及其在心智结构中的位置。
参考文献
1陈英和:《认知发展心理学》,杭州:浙江人民出版社,1996年,第1-2页。
2 涂纪亮、陈波编:《蒯因著作集》第4卷,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007年,第543页。
3 史迪芬·平克:《语言本能:探索人类语言进化的奥秘》,洪兰译,汕头:汕头大学出版社,2004年,第428页。
4 Deirdre Wilson,“New Directions for Research on Pragmatics and Modularity,”UCL Working Papers in Linguistics,No.15,2003,pp.105-127.
5 Marvin A.Minsky,“Framework for Representing Knowledge,”in P.H.Winston,ed.,The Psychology of Computer Vision,New York:McG raw Hill,1975,pp.211-277;D.Lemann,“Stereotypical Reasoning:Logical Properties,”Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics,No.6,1998,pp.49-58.
1Herbert P.Grice,“Meaning Revisited,”in N.V.Smith,ed.,Mutual Knowledge,New York:Academic Press,1982,pp.223-243;D.Sperber and D.Wilson,Relevance Communication and Cognition,Oxford:Blackwell Publishers,1995.
2Sperber and Wilson,Relevance Communication and Cognition,p.27;Robyn Carston,“Relevance-theoretic Pragmatics and Modularity,”UCL Working Papers in Linguistics,1997,No.9,p.29;Sophia Marmaridou,Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition,Amsterdam:John Benjamins,2000,p.322.
3Sperber and Wilson,Relevance Communication and Cognition,p.27.
4D.Sperber,“Metarepresentation in an Evolutionary Perspective,”In Sperber,ed.,Metarepresentations:A Multidisciplinary Perspective,Oxford:Oxford University Press,2000,pp.117-137.
5D.Sperber and D.Wilson,“Pragmatics Modularity and Mind-reading,”Mind and Language,No.17,2002,pp.3-23.
6Jerry A.Fodor,The Modularity of Mind,Cambridge:MIT Press,1983,p.36.
7A.N.Chomsky,Language and Mind,New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.,1984,p.103.
8Louise Cummings,Pragmatics:A Multidisciplinary Perspective,Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press,2005,p.157.
1Fodor,The Modularity of Mind,p.91.
2Asa.Kasher,“Pragmatics and the Modularity of Mind,”in S.Davis,ed.,Pragmatics:A Reader,New York:Oxford University Press,1991,p.579.
3D.Wilson and D.Sperber,“Pragmatics and Modularity,”in Davis,ed.,Pragmatics,pp.67-84.
4D.Sperber,“In Defense of Massive Modularity,”in E.Dupoux,ed.,Language,Brain and Cognitive Development:Essays in Honour of Jacques Mehl,Cambridge:MIT Press,2002,pp.47-57.
5D.Wilson,“Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication,”in D.Sperber,ed.,Metarepresentations:An Interdisciplinary Perspective,New York:Oxford University Press,2000,pp.411-448.
6参见史迪芬·平克:《语言本能:探索人类语言进化的奥秘》,第429页。
7Cummings,Pragmatics,p.157.
1Allan Paivio,Mental Representations:A Dual Coding Approach,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1986,p.53.
2Cummings,Pragmatics,p.140.
3Willard V.O.Quine,“Two Dogmas of Empiricism,”in Quine,ed.,From a Logical Point of View,New York:Harper and Row,1961,pp.20-46.
4Kasher,Pragmatics and the Modularity of Mind,p.569.
5Cummings,Pragmatics,p.141.
1A.N.Chomsky,Rules and Representation,Oxford:Bail Blackwell Publisher Ltd.,1980,p.5.
2Fodor,The Modularity of Mind,p.32.
3Kasher,Pragmatics and the Modularity of Mind,p.569.
4Cummings,Pragmatics,p.142.
5参见史迪芬·平克:《语言本能:探索人类语言进化的奥秘》,第429页。
6Louise Cumming,“Rejecting the Urge to Theories in Fallacy Inquiry,”Argumentation,No.18,2004,p.1.
7参见刘利民:《在语言中盘旋——先秦名家“诡辩”命题的纯语言思辨理性研究》,四川大学博士学位论文,2006年,第36、43页。
1 G.W.Leibniz,New Essays on Human Understanding,edited by P.Remnant and J.Bennett,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1982,p.205.
【关闭】
