改革开放40年中国创新治理的回顾与展望
A Retrospect of China's Innovative Governance over the 40 Years since the Reform and Opening Up and Its Prospect
作者：章文光;宋斌斌;
Author：
收稿日期： 年卷（期）页码：2019,223(04):-38-47
期刊名称：四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
Journal Name：Journal of Sichuan University (Social Science Edition）
关键字：国家创新体系;改革开放40年;三螺旋;实验主义治理;创新治理
Key words：
基金项目：国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于市场导向的创新体系中政府作用边界、机制及优化”(18ZDA114)
中文摘要
从实验主义治理和三螺旋创新理论视角,梳理中国改革开放40年来创新治理发展历程,尤其是创新驱动战略实施以来中国政府创新治理的实践经验,可总结出中国式实验主义创新治理理论框架。在该框架下,产政学组织、"央—地"政府、人财智资源深入互动,各级政府通过整体式试点—筛选—扩散、融合式共同学习、动态式调整和适应性识别等机制,调整创新主体关系,回应外部环境变化,并对创新政策进行验证、强化或纠偏,构建最优化的国家层面战略性创新政策。
参考文献
(1)朱孟珏、周春山:《改革开放以来我国城市新区开发的演变历程、特征及机制研究》,《现代城市研究》2012年第9期,第80-85页。
(2)周姣、赵敏:《我国高新技术产业开发区创新效率及其影响因素的实证研究》,《科技管理研究》2014年第10期,第1-6页。
(3)章文光、李伟:《创新型城市创新效率评价与投入冗余分析》,《科技进步与对策》2017年第6期,第122-126页。
(4)章文光、宋斌斌:《从国家创新型城市试点看中国实验主义治理》,《中国行政管理》2018年第12期,第89-95页。
(5)Elinor Ostrom,Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990,pp.132-153.
(6)Mary Crossan and Marina Apaydin,“A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation:A Systematic Review of Literature,” Journal of Management Studies,Vol.47,No.6,2010,pp.154-191.
(7)R.Jacob and Z.Merle,“Utilization of Social Science Knowledge in Science Policy:Systems of Innovation,Triple Helix and VINNOVA,” Social Science Information,Vol.45,No.3,2006,pp.431-462.
(8)G.Vertova,“The State and National Systems of Innovation:A Sympathetic Critique,” Levy Economics Institute,Working Paper Series,No.823,2014,pp.401-424.
(9)J.Wonglimpiyarat and P.Khaemasunun,“China?s Innovation Financing System:Triple Helix Policy Perspectives,” Triple Helix,Vol.2,No.1,2015,pp.1-18.
(10)Z.Todeva and R.Emanuela,“Governance of Innovation and Intermediation in Triple Helix Interactions,”Industry and Higher Education,Vol.27,No.4,2013,pp.263-278.
(11)S.Bartholomew,“National Systems of Biotechnology Innovation:Complex Interdependence in the Global System,” Journal of International Business Studies,Vol.66,No.3,1997,pp.353-366.
(12)K.Mattias,“Constitutionalism and Experimentalist Governance,” Regulation & Governance,Vol.15,No.1,2012,pp.147-163.
(13)W.T.Woo,“The Real Reasons for China?s Growth,” The China Journal,Vol.30,No.2,1999,pp.228-258.
(14)H.Cai and D.Treisman,“Did Government Decentralization Cause China?s Economic Miracle?” World Politics,Vol.58,No.4,2006,pp.505-535.
(15)C.Xue and Y.Xu,“Influence Factor Analysis of Enterprise IT Innovation Capacity Based on System Dynamics,” Procedia Engineering,Vol.174,No.1,2017,pp.232-239.
(16)Jacob and Merle,“Utilization of Social Science Knowledge in Science Policy:Systems of Innovation,Triple Helix and VINNOVA,” pp.431-462.
(17)Crossan and Apaydin,“A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation:A Systematic Review of Literature,” pp.154-191.
(18)Ostrom,Governing the Commons,pp.132-153.
(19)S.Heilmann,“Policy Experimentation in China?s Economic Rise,” Studies in Comparative International Development,Vol.43,No.1,2008,pp.1-26.
(20)S.Chung,“Building a National Innovation System through Regional Innovation Systems,” Technovation,Vol.22,No.8,2002,pp.485-491.
(21)R.Agranoff and M.McGuire,“Expanding Intergovernmental Management?s Hidden Dimensions,” American Review of Public Administration,Vol.29,No.4,1999,pp.352-369.
(22)L.Fuenfschilling and B.Truffer,“The Interplay of Institutions,Actors and Technologies in Socio-technical Systems:An Analysis of Transformations in the Australian Urban Water Sector,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change,Vol.103,2016,pp.298-312.
(23)G.Marks and L.Hooghe,“Unravelling the Central State,But How?Types of Multilevel Governance,” American Political Science Review,Vol.97,No.2,2003,pp.233-243.
(24)章文光、宋斌斌:《从国家创新型城市试点看中国实验主义治理》,《中国行政管理》2018年第12期,第89-95页。
【关闭】
