期刊导航

论文摘要

下颌切牙Empress 2瓷贴面与全瓷冠牙预备体及全瓷修复复合体的抗折裂研究

An in vitro study of the fracture strength of tooth preparations for Empress 2 veneers and crowns and mandibular incisors restored with Empress 2 veneers and crowns

作者:魏煦 李彦

Author:

收稿日期:2009-12-25          年卷(期)页码:2009,27(06):622-622-625

期刊名称:华西口腔医学杂志

Journal Name:West China Journal of Stomatology

关键字:下颌切牙,可铸玻璃陶瓷,瓷贴面,全瓷冠,

Key words:mandibular incisor,castable ceramic,ceramic veneer,all ceramic crown,

基金项目:

中文摘要

目的比较下颌切牙Empress 2瓷贴面和全瓷冠牙预备体及修复体粘接后复合体的抗折强度。方法选择人离体下颌切牙50颗,随机分为5组。A组为瓷贴面牙体预备组,B组为全瓷冠牙体预备组,C组为瓷贴面修复组,D组为全瓷冠修复组,E组为完整下颌切牙(对照组)。采用标准化牙体预备过程,Empress 2铸瓷系统及树脂粘接技术完成瓷贴面-牙体和全瓷冠-牙体复合体。使用Instron万能试验机测试5组牙齿的抗折裂载荷值,采用方差分析进行统计学分析。结果A、B、C、D、E组的抗折裂载荷值分别为:(576.11±91.53)、(204.13±85.88)、(451.50±116.81)、(386.16±117.75)、(566.05±121.37)N。经统计学分析,B组抗折裂载荷值低于其他组(P

英文摘要

Objective To compare the fracture resistance of mandibular incisors′ preparations for veneers and crowns, mandibular incisors restored with Empress 2 veneers and crowns. Methods 50 human mandibular incisors were randomly divided into five groups. Each group consisted of ten teeth and the treatment obtained as follows: A, tooth preparations for veneers; B, tooth preparations for crowns; C, teeth restored with veneers; D, teeth restored with crowns; E, untreated group. The teeth received standardized preparation and the restorations were manufactured with Empress 2 system and cemented with resin luting agent. The fracture resistances of teeth were measured by Instron universal testing machine and statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA. Results The fracture resistances of A, B, C, D, E were (576.11±91.53), (204.13±85.88), (451.50±116.81), (386.16±117.75) and (566.05±121.37)N, respectively. The statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences between five groups. There were no significant differences between group A and E, group C and D. Conclusion Tooth preparations for veneers did not significantly reduce the fracture resistance of mandibular incisor. The fracture resistance of teeth restored with Empress 2 veneers and crowns did not significantly differ from each other.

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065