期刊导航

论文摘要

916份可摘局部义齿加工设计单质量的调查评估

Audit to assess the quality of 916 prosthetic prescriptions of removable partial dentures

作者:张呐, 毛渤淳, 戴云涵, 陈圣恺, 由子樱, 张隽婧, 陈昕, 董皓月, 岳莉, 于海洋

Author:Zhang Na, Mao Bochun, Dai Yunhan, Chen Shengkai, You Ziying, Zhang Junjing, Chen Xin, Dong Haoyue, Yue Li, Yu Haiyang

收稿日期:2021-09-04          年卷(期)页码:2023,41(3):315-315-322

期刊名称:华西口腔医学杂志

Journal Name:West China Journal of Stomatology

关键字:可摘局部义齿,义齿加工设计单,医技沟通,义齿加工厂,

Key words:removable partial dentures,prosthetic prescription,communication,dental laboratory,

基金项目:成都市科技局技术创新研发项目(2019-YF05-01086-SN)

中文摘要

目的 评估可摘局部义齿(RPD)加工设计单的填写质量,分析医技沟通及信息传递的现状。 方法 随机抽取某一全国性大型义齿加工厂在4周内的RPD加工设计单,按照委托方的等级将加工设计单分为3组。调查内容包括患者基本信息、医生基本信息、设计图信息、其他详细信息以及出件时间等信息。同时由2位质检员共同完成质量评估。 结果 共收集和评估了916份设计单的填写情况。患者及医生的姓名填写率最好,均为97.6%(n=894);出件时间填写情况最差,仅占6.4%(n=59)。58.7%(n=538)的设计单无医生联系电话,86.8%(n=795)设计单的设计图信息部分填写不全。质量评估结果为74.2%设计单未达到入检“合格”的标准。 结论 目前RPD加工设计单整体上看填写质量较差,RPD设计及制作中医技职责划分不明确,医技沟通情况不理想。

英文摘要

ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to assess the quality of prosthetic prescriptions of removable partial dentures (RPDs) and to analyze the current situation of the communication and information delivery between clinicians and technicians.MethodsAll RPD prosthetic prescriptions received by a major dental laboratory in 4 weeks were involved in a quality audit, and the prescriptions were divided into three groups in accordance with the grades of clients. The filling of prosthetic prescriptions was recorded. The items in the prescriptions for audit included the general information of the patient, the general information of the clinician, the design diagram information, other detailed information, and the return date. The prescriptions were categorized into four levels on the basis of their quality by two quality inspectors who have been working for more than 10 years.ResultsA total of 916 prescriptions were collected and assessed. The names in the general information of the patient and the clinician were filled out best, both at the rate of 97.6% (n=894). The return date was filled out worst, only at the rate of 6.4% (n=59). Of those prescriptions, 86.8% (n=795) exhibited inadequate design diagram information. The results of the quality assessment demonstrated that 74.2% of prescriptions were assessed as noncompliant ones and failed to meet the acceptable clinical quality standard.ConclusionAt present, the overall quality of RPD prosthetic prescriptions is poor. The responsibilities of clinicians and technicians are unclear, and the communication between them is not ideal.

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065