ObjectiveThis study aimed to systematically compare the effects of flapless and flapped implantations on the surrounding soft tissues of dental implants.MethodsNine databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials, OpenGrey, OpenDoar, Scopus, and Ovid, from January 1, 2013, to August 27, 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing flapless implantation with flapped implantation for restoration of missing teeth were included. Meta-analysis was conducted on studies that met the inclusion criteria by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0.ResultsA total of 1 245 articles were retrieved, and 17 studies were ultimately included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that flapless implantation resulted in better healing of the soft tissues around the dental implants than flapped implantation. Moreover, flapless implantation showed superior changes in implant success rate [mean difference (MD)=1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.02, 1.10),P=0.004], the width of keratinized gingival changes [MD=0.10, 95%CI (0.00, 0.20),P=0.04], and probing depth [MD=-0.60, 95%CI (-0.67, -0.53),P<0 .000 01], with statistically significant differences. the final combined results of modified plaque index [standardized mean difference (smd)="-0.41," 95%ci (-0.81, 0.00),P=0.05] and modified sulcus bleeding index [SMD=-0.44, 95%CI (-0.78, -0.10),P=0.01] showed superiority over flapped implantation. The papillary presence index was higher in the flapless implantation group than in the flapped implantation group. No statistically significant differences were observed in plaque index and gingival indices changes between the two groups.ConclusionFlapless implantation can achieve higher implant success rate, smaller changes in the width of keratinized gingival, and smaller probing depths than flapped implantation. It also has advantages in terms of modified plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index, and papillary presence index.
