期刊导航

论文摘要

基于LCA方法对毛皮加工过程的环境影响评价

The Environmental Impact Assessment of Fur Making Process Using LCA Methodology

作者:李玉红, 廖学品, 王安, 戴若菡

Author:LI Yuhong, LIAO Xuepin, WANG An, DAI Ruohan

收稿日期:2019-11-06          年卷(期)页码:2020,30(2):6-11

期刊名称:皮革科学与工程

Journal Name:Leather Science and Engineering

关键字:eBalance软件,生命周期评价,毛皮加工过程,羊剪绒,清洁生产,

Key words:eBalance software,life cycle assessment(LCA),fur making process,sheep shearing,cleaner production,

基金项目:国家科技重大专项(2017ZX07402004)资助项目

中文摘要

根据生命周期评价(LCA)的原理及理论框架,采用eBalance软件,以一次能源消耗(PED)、酸化潜值(AP)、富营养化潜值(EP)、全球变暖潜值(GWP)作为环境影响评价指标,对传统毛皮加工过程中浸水、脱脂、浸酸、鞣制、复鞣、加脂6个主要工序进行了生命周期评价。通过对上述环境影响指标进行特征化、归一化计算以及清单数据敏感度分析发现,鞣制和复鞣工序对环境影响的贡献最大,这两个生产工序对环境影响累计在65.29%~71.34%,该结果为毛皮加工过程清洁化生产提供了参考依据。

英文摘要

Based on the principle and the theory of life cycle assessment(LCA),the eBalance software was used to evaluate the fur making processes,including soaking,degreasing,pickling,tanning,retanning and fat-liquring. The primary energy demand(PED),acidification potential(AP),eutrophication potential(EP),global warming potential(GWP)were used as the indicators of the environmental impact assessment. Based on the characteristics,normalization and sensitivity analysis of these indicators,it was found that the tanning and re-tanning process have the greatest contribution to the environment burden,and the cumulative environmental impact of these two processes is 65.29%-71.34%. In summary,this study provides a reference for the clean production of fur making industry.

下一条:无甲醛双氰胺及三聚氰胺树脂功能表征

关闭

Copyright © 2020四川大学期刊社 版权所有.

地址:成都市一环路南一段24号

邮编:610065